Saturday, August 6, 2016

no zoning changes, no trees





zoning change seemed traded for ball park in what residents think is a quid pro quo donations for zoning change

shortly after the council approved a zoning change for Valero's administration building on Ohio Street, it is slowly being revealed that councilmembers have been discussing Valero's funding of a ball park in District C in the area of the oil spill, reminiscent of the zoning change for trees trade by Murphy.  


reposted from Tuesday, March 16, 2010

no title



Playing politicians against survivors instead of taking responsibility for failing to implement its own hurricane preparedness plans, and with little to no humanitarian aide to residents while gifting generous donations to politicians post crude oil spill, Murphy Oil adds insult to injury in its proposal to use residential homes for its own gain. Although presented as a transient contractor's parking lot, Murphy Oil admits it really wants heavy industrial zoning for future usage. Future heavy industrial usage not just on the north side, but the south side as well.

Industrial and Commercial Usage of residential properties in this area are a determent to the residents who have returned, provide nothing towards the safety of the community and lowers the buffer while rewarding an unjust enrichment for an incident of their own negligence.

Encroachment, incursion, a taking, you name it what you want, the result makes the parish further liable.
.
It's our land, we'll use it as we do, if you please. [We'll do what we d*** well please]
.
Denying secure tenure to victims after the worse environmental disaster, the worse land based oil spill, Murphy Oil proposes the financially strapped community raise its own funds to construct a dog park and other recreational usage where existing residual crude oil remains on the land of domiciled residents. Residents want no such thing and point out the numerous, readily available parks and parkways throughout the parish, which would be better suited for these suggestions.
.
Accepting donations for trees with the implication "No Zoning Changes, No Trees", newly elected officials are pushing this lovely linear park as the best thing for the community, while not only ignoring their constituents, but also the existing facilities and economic development opportunities at .
.
Slicker than oil and more offensive than obnoxious smells, this proposal was rejected by residents who serve on the Council's Murphy Oil Buffer Zone Committee. Yet, the Council continues the misnomer that if Murphy were only to reveal "The Plan"-- "The Plan" which everyone but the land owners and surrounding neighbors seem to have access to -- that it could move forward --- just exactly what the council wants to move forward is unclear to those homeowners who would be asked to once again lose everything.


Friday, July 22, 2016

more or less the same

Thursday, February 21, 2008


more or less on the horizon



FROM 2008   
47302. NOLA FORUM

INTEGRITY

02/21/08 11:34 AM
The people of St. Bernard deserve to be informed by their elected officials. Residents of District C, who are and have been for many years concerned about the expansion of industrial giants and the poisonous emissions from the manufacture and refining, have indeed been lied to by their elected officials. The stone walling and lies of deception continue to this day. When even one resident asks, " what is being built here?" he has a right to be answered. Our neighbor, Murphy Oil USA is going to build a lab on the site of the old Campagna Skiff Company location. We were NEVER given an opportunity, as a neighbor or neighborhood to examine the plan, ask questions or express our concerns. To offer input now is obviously an insult. As I stated before it was a done deal. Probably years in the making between our government and that industrial giant. Encroachment. A nasty word. But it is happening. Murphy, in moving it's lab from the river side of St. Bernard Hwy (probably to expand it's plant) now finds that the location where they plan to build the new lab is not large enough to accommodate parking. They want to (ENCROACH) on to residential property. They want a zone change. After everything said about greenspace, and bufferzone. Our government continues to play along with the plan. The Murphy plan.Our parish president and council members as well as zoning and planning commissions need to remember who pays them. Or is that exactly what they are doing?

 
The refinery was originally located on the other side of the highway and the land behind the neighborhood was not zoned for industrial use.  Then over the years there were a series of wise decisions to allow more and more industrial zoning changes further and further away from the river and into the backyards of our community. The processing plant doubled in the 1970's and several large additions including a clean fuels process began in the late 1990's early 2000's. How did the Parish ever allow these units to be constructed so close to family dwellings??
 
Let's not make the same mistake again with warehouses, administration buildings, parking etc. on Jacob Drive; that land was purchased with the pretense of a green zone buffer and a good neighbor would honor that agreement.  Any other use makes the Parish further liable.
 
 
Above, EPA Region VI map of oil spill
Notice the area just west of the processing plant was not "in the oil spill" but this is the area most often pushed by parish officials to participate in the buyup.

Below map of oil spill first purported by Parish government
 
 

Thursday, July 21, 2016

Thursday throwback


The obvious reality that oil refineries are not good neighbors (go to www.oilrefinerypollution.com) and contemplating expansion of one in a fragile wetlands ecosystem, knowing that sulfur dioxide is the principal precursor to acid rain and the risks to human health, is irresponsible and ultimately a formula for long-range health and environmental costs we can’t even begin to envision.

We’ve all driven through and, if possible around, cities or towns that choose to chase smokestacks for their economic vitality. Evidence is abundant that making billions in profits superseded quality of life considerations

For the sake of our health, we must choose wisely. It’s no longer a question of whether we can. Global indicators increasingly are telling us that the real question for the future is whether we should?!



 

excerpts from LETTER: Refinery expansion would degrade city

The Daily Telegram - 07/08/2008
To The Telegram:

From     — Paul D. Helbach,  Brule

 

Tuesday, July 19, 2016

SIP Calls for excess emissions --- Sulfur Dioxide

 
 
State Implementation Plans:
 
The Louisiana DEQ must submit a plan to the United States EPA that demonstrates changes at the nearby plants will bring the air quality of St Bernard Parish into healthy levels for Sulfur Dioxide.
 
Currently, St Bernard Parish’s air quality is in violation of the one-hour health standard for sulfur dioxide [ 75 ppb ], and the amount of sulfur dioxide in our air is causing public health issues.  
Sulfur dioxide is a nonflammable, colorless gas that is heavier than air, and has a strong, pungent odor with irritating properties.
 
Acute exposure occurs when sulfur dioxide levels are ten parts per billion (10 ppb) for 15 minutes; it is not uncommon to have acute exposure events in St Bernard Parish.
  
Below is a chart of 5 minute readings from various days at the Chalmette Vista monitor, which is located at the site of Blue Bird Park playground.  The one-hour average is displayed as CDLST intervals.  The 5 minute chart illustrates the importance of keeping the one-hour average below 75 ppb, and easily shows how often the 15 minute intervals with concentrations of sulfur dioxide at or higher than 10 ppb occur.

CHALMETTE VISTA SO2 005m
Date Time (CST) Final Value (PPB)
July 4, 2016 16:00 6.0
July 4, 2016 16:05 4.2
July 4, 2016 16:10 4.0
July 4, 2016 16:15 3.4
July 4, 2016 16:20 25.9
July 4, 2016 16:25 67.4
July 4, 2016 16:30 19.1
July 4, 2016 16:35 14.0
July 4, 2016 16:40 22.6
July 4, 2016 16:45 35.9
July 4, 2016 16:50 83.5
July 4, 2016 16:55 66.0
5 pm (CDLST) one-hour avg   29.3 ppb 
     
July 4, 2016 17:00 44.9
July 4, 2016 17:05 190.8
July 4, 2016 17:10 178.0
July 4, 2016 17:15 169.3
July 4, 2016 17:20 140.2
July 4, 2016 17:25 146.5
July 4, 2016 17:30 170.9
July 4, 2016 17:35 118.0
July 4, 2016 17:40 18.8
July 4, 2016 17:45 95.7
July 4, 2016 17:50 88.9
July 4, 2016 17:55 61.5
6 pm (CDLST) one-hour avg   118.6 ppb 
     
     
July 6, 2016 16:00 62.4
July 6, 2016 16:05 8.0
July 6, 2016 16:10 5.1
July 6, 2016 16:15 13.0
July 6, 2016 16:20 84.0
July 6, 2016 16:25 97.4
July 6, 2016 16:30 31.1
July 6, 2016 16:35 37.9
July 6, 2016 16:40 147.7
July 6, 2016 16:45 29.0
July 6, 2016 16:50 16.9
July 6, 2016 16:55 55.9
6pm (CDLST) one-hour avg   49 ppb 
     
July 6, 2016 17:00 9.0
July 6, 2016 17:05 6.5
July 6, 2016 17:10 63.5
July 6, 2016 17:15 127.7
July 6, 2016 17:20 145.4
July 6, 2016 17:25 189.4
July 6, 2016 17:30 216.6
July 6, 2016 17:35 173.1
July 6, 2016 17:40 20.5
July 6, 2016 17:45 19.6
July 6, 2016 17:50 12.2
July 6, 2016 17:55 6.4
7pm (CDLST) one-hour avg   82.4 ppb 
     
July 7, 2016 13:00 11.0
July 7, 2016 13:05 131.5
July 7, 2016 13:10 31.6
July 7, 2016 13:15 60.2
July 7, 2016 13:20 164.2
July 7, 2016 13:25 38.6
July 7, 2016 13:30 29.3
July 7, 2016 13:35 56.9
July 7, 2016 13:40 25.8
July 7, 2016 13:45 24.6
July 7, 2016 13:50 285.2
July 7, 2016 13:55 54.0
3pm (CDLST) one-hour avg   76 ppb 
     
July 7, 2016 14:00 22.0
July 7, 2016 14:05 111.6
July 7, 2016 14:10 23.9
July 7, 2016 14:15 20.9
July 7, 2016 14:20 148.6
July 7, 2016 14:25 89.8
July 7, 2016 14:30 12.4
July 7, 2016 14:35 7.6
July 7, 2016 14:40 6.4
July 7, 2016 14:45 37.4
July 7, 2016 14:50 32.1
July 7, 2016 14:55 38.2
4pm (CDLST) one-hour avg   45.9 ppb 
     
July 7, 2016 15:00 252.6
July 7, 2016 15:05 137.2
July 7, 2016 15:10 38.8
July 7, 2016 15:15 101.5
July 7, 2016 15:20 38.0
July 7, 2016 15:25 52.2
July 7, 2016 15:30 9.4
July 7, 2016 15:35 7.2
July 7, 2016 15:40 7.7
July 7, 2016 15:45 5.9
July 7, 2016 15:50 20.2
July 7, 2016 15:55 142.2
4pm (CDLST) one-hour avg   67.7 ppb  
     
July 7, 2016 18:00 122.1
July 7, 2016 18:05 118.6
July 7, 2016 18:10 113.3
July 7, 2016 18:15 161.8
July 7, 2016 18:20 127.5
July 7, 2016 18:25 25.3
July 7, 2016 18:30 21.5
July 7, 2016 18:35 28.9
July 7, 2016 18:40 10.7
July 7, 2016 18:45 13.8
July 7, 2016 18:50 8.4
July 7, 2016 18:55 6.6
7pm (CDLST) one-hour avg   63.2 ppb  






 

Blog Archive