“You can’t remediate dead fish,” said an elected official from one of the parishes that shares the lakefront. “There is no amount of money that would make us understand this and accept it. We are fine the way we are.”
SAVE LAKE MAUREPAS SAVE OUR MANCHAC
https://www.facebook.com/smanchac/
Two recent articles in DeSmog note growing concerns for Lake Maurepas' fragile ecosystem and the failed or underperformed carbon capture technologies, which have been described as inefficient, underperforming, and enormously expensive.
Julie Dermansky
The Battle to Stop Air Products’ Carbon Capture Project at Lake Maurepas Grows
Pro-industry NIMBYs leading the fight question the company’s claims of being “clean.”
Hydrogen, which can be made from natural gas, is only “blue” if carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) is used to offset some of the carbon emitted from the manufacturing. Air Products, the Fortune 500 company behind this proposed project, is planning to store the carbon it captures in injection wells under Lake Maurepas, a prized ecosystem that offers plentiful seafood and vital storm surge protection for nearby residents.
Dana Drugmand Big Oil’s Been Secretly Validating Critics’ Concerns about Carbon Capture A DeSmog analysis of subpoenaed internal oil industry communications shows CCS as the strategic linchpin for more oil and gas development.
There is mounting evidence, however, that CCS is ineffective. Numerous projects have failed or underperformed. Some studies indicate the technology does little to reduce emissions, and may even increase carbon and other air pollution. Climate and environmental justice organizations, some climate and energy experts, and some lawmakers, are speaking out against the false promise of CCS. And in the wake of the IRA’s passage, the business partners who started the first private CCS company in the United States wrote an op-ed in The New York Times condemning the technology and the billions of federal dollars propping it up. They argue that CCS is inefficient, underperforming, and enormously expensive, while facilitating further fossil fuel development — especially when the captured carbon is used to extract more oil and gas.
No comments:
Post a Comment