No one should have to sacrifice his or her health for the sake of polluters' profits—no individual, and certainly no community.
Friday, June 21, 2013
sierra club magazine
And Justice for All
Working to make the promise reality
by Michael Brune
No one should have to sacrifice his or her health for the sake of polluters' profits—no individual, and certainly no community.
Sunday, June 16, 2013
SBPG LND PROGRAM
Frequently Asked Questions
http://sbpg.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=959&Itemid=209
http://sbpg.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=959&Itemid=209
air sampling technology
“If we’re measuring air quality, then we can say, ‘Look, we have real evidence here. You have to do something.’ ”
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/03/microsampling-air-pollution/?src=recg
Microsampling air pollution" by Peter Andrey and Mayeta Clark
We would love to have two of these devices !! For sulfates and hydrogen sulfide.
Some even include measurements for sound levels!! And check out ACAM's program.
http://www.habitatmap.org/habitatmap_docs/HowToBuildAnAirCastingAirMonitor.pdf
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/03/microsampling-air-pollution/?src=recg
Microsampling air pollution" by Peter Andrey and Mayeta Clark
We would love to have two of these devices !! For sulfates and hydrogen sulfide.
Some even include measurements for sound levels!! And check out ACAM's program.
http://www.habitatmap.org/habitatmap_docs/HowToBuildAnAirCastingAirMonitor.pdf
Saturday, June 15, 2013
Thursday, June 6, 2013
EPA's email
EPA's rush email tracking a resident's attendance at public meeting
see page three of EPA email regarding a proposed asbestos burn public meeting
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/159309918/EPA-tracks-residents-attendance-at-public-meetings
see page three of EPA email regarding a proposed asbestos burn public meeting
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/159309918/EPA-tracks-residents-attendance-at-public-meetings
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
vibrations from plant shaking houses
.
May 20 2013 Valero Energy has large flaring event with loud roaring and vibrations from the plant that shakes houses, light fixtures, ceiling fans, etc. The source is reported to be the hydrocracker again, which had ongoing flaring since early May 2013.
http://concernedcitizensaroundmurphy.blogspot.com/p/2013.html
Throughout the recent past, residents have endured countless days of continuous earsplitting noise levels or roaring noise that sounds like jet engines. In the past several years, , noise measured above the local ordinance limits have been attributed to many different sources within the processing plant, include the hydrocracker, the cat cracker, broken boilers from Katrina, steam atomizers on top the flares, low NOx burners, vacuum trucks, processing valves on ALKY unit, steam use, over steaming to the flares, and various startup and shutdown proceedures. Residents received many promises for appropriate noise muffling and sound barriers at the source point. In 2010, a Judge found the plant owners (Murphy Oil) had not installed appropriate noise control equipment. Prior to the sale of the refinery, when management purported to be the transition team, in a Fall 2011 public meeting, we explained the refinery processes and equipment are still shaking our houses. There was little to no response, no new expressed concern to further a solution. When asked for information on a particular August 2011 incident which caused houses to move and rumble, it was said there was no information for that date. While some information was available for the May 2013 occurrence, it did not include any remedies for an unacceptable situation.
We have an unfortunate zoning situation with heavy industry adjacent to residential neighborhoods. Despite its industrial zoning, excessive noise is out of place and unwelcome here. No neighborhood should be subjected to such "typical refinery noises" yet these noises continue to disturb us at all times of the day and night. Therefore, measures that are appropriate for normal industry practice are inadequate under these circumstances. Industry must recognize the need to do more than other refineries that are properly buffered from residences.
This noise is interfering with human activities.
May 20 2013 Valero Energy has large flaring event with loud roaring and vibrations from the plant that shakes houses, light fixtures, ceiling fans, etc. The source is reported to be the hydrocracker again, which had ongoing flaring since early May 2013.
http://concernedcitizensaroundmurphy.blogspot.com/p/2013.html
Interference with activities such as speech, sleep,
and learning – The thresholds for speech
interference indoors are about 45 dBA if the noise
is steady and above 55 dBA if the noise
is fluctuating. Outdoors, the thresholds are about
15 dBA higher. Steady noise of
sufficient
intensity (above 35
dBA) and fluctuating noise levels above about 45 dBA have been
shown to affect sleep.
…..annoyance felt in a community for noises intruding into homes or
affecting outdoor activity areas, the main causes
for annoyance are interference with
speech,
radio and television, house vibrations, and interference with sleep and rest…..
Hearing loss occurs mainly due to chronic
exposure to excessive noise, but may be due to a
single event such as an explosion. Natural
hearing loss associated with aging may also be
accelerated from chronic exposure to loud
noise
Thursday, May 16, 2013
clear the air, it's filthy
"If our air has too much of a pollutant like sulfur dioxide already, then its important to know the facts when a facility plans to put much more of it in our air. If pollution exceeds a certain level, then requiring controls could rein it in to safer levels. We can have both safer emissions as well as provide for public health and our quality of life -- the choice doesn't have to be one or the other."
/9_22_2011__Press_Release_EPA_Veto_Murphy_Oil_Air_Permit
Filthy air
The U.S. EPA illegally allows Valero Energy's oil refinery in St. Bernard Parish, to pollute and poison the air, Concerned Citizens Around Murphy claim in Federal Court.
Federal Court Complaint: Concerned Citizens Around Murphy vs EPA, filed Wednesday May 15 2013 in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana.
There seems to be a systemic problem of harmful emissions simply eluding permit applications in St Bernard Parish, Louisiana and the result is a significant deterioration of the air we breathe and the various adverse health consequences. Just yesterday, the SBPG HRQLC Commissioners expressed the community’s health concerns about the non-permitted emissions at a St Bernard calcining plant ; emissions of chemicals that LDEQ’s monitoring may not even sample for, including antimony, hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid and sulfates.
.
The Federal Court Complaint filed May 15 2013 by students at Tulane University’s Environmental Law Clinic, on behalf of an association of neighbors, concerns a benzene saturation unit at Valero Energy’s Meraux refinery. The unit was constructed by Valero’s predecessor, Murphy Oil, U.S.A.
.
.
EPA previously objected to Murphy Oil’s Title V Permit because, among other reasons, the permit record did not provide an adequate basis for LDEQ’s determinations. Petitions to EPA demonstrated that emissions calculations were low-balled and some emissions eluded the application. If corrected, the application would require more stringent pollution controls. LDEQ's response only supplemented the permit record, without an opportunity for public input, and failed to resolve the objections in EPA’s Order.
Concerned Citizens Around Murphy now seeks relief in Federal Court to compel EPA to act without further unreasonable delay, to modify, terminate, or revoke the permit. A proper permit would lower emissions and protect human health. http://www.epa.gov/NSR/psd.html
The community wants Prevention not Dilution as the solution to pollution.
http://sbpg.pegcentral.com/player.php?video=cf25b0023310f0d05aba507d8dd3c84e
Labels:
EPA,
LDEQ,
St Bernard sulfur dioxide,
Valero Energy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)